Am 12.07.2013 00:35, schrieb Thomas Morley:
2013/7/11 Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org>:
Am 11.07.2013 23:19, schrieb Thomas Morley:
[...]
Please use 2.16-syntax, if you declare \version "2.16.2" in
building-blocks-start.ly
or change the version.
Hm, actually I thought about that.
I never used 2.16 so it would mean an artificial effort to 'backport' to
that version. But I always thought that for writing tutorials or similar
documents it would be advisable to use stable versions.
What would you think? Of course using the versions I'm used to is much more
practical ...
There's currently only one command
\override Beam.stencil = ##f
with a conflict of 2.16. and 2.17.
Why not use old syntax, still working with 2.17:
\override Beam #'stencil = ##f
?
Would compile with 2.16. _and_ 2.17
I would have done that if your fantastic non-beaming function wouldn't
have made that command obsolete completely :-)
[...]
Move \numericTimeSignature into \layout { \context { \DrumStaff ... } }
dito
Probably better to use \numericTimeSignature in a Staff-context
\layout { \context { \Staff ... } }
Done.
BTW: All your (or others') feedback will directly benefit our common
cause because it will go into a blog post which will probably be a
striking demonstration of LilyPond's power ;-)
You may preview the current state to get an impression at
http://lilypondblog.org/?p=912&preview=1&_ppp=6c25cb2c23
Best
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
