Henning Hraban Ramm <lilypon...@fiee.net> writes:

> Am 2013-09-06 um 23:50 schrieb Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de>:
>
>> Am 06.09.2013 19:12, schrieb David Rogers:
>>> Hello
>>> 
>>> There have been several methods in the history of LilyPond for
>>> integrating LilyPond scores with ConTeXt documents (ConTeXt is a newer
>>> more-flexible system somewhat analogous to LaTeX).
>>> 
>>> Right now, which is the best choice for putting ConTeXt and LilyPond
>>> together? (Your answer might be "Don't bother, just use LaTeX", if you
>>> have a good reason for saying that.)
>>> 
>> 
>> Hehe – just use LaTeX ;-)
>
> I would not. Let’s not start a flame war here.

Context is not supported by Lilypond-book as far as I can tell.  That
might be a worthwhile project for a Context user.

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to