Also American, can't see the need for this because LP supports defining your own pitch names in an include file.
For example, I once made an include file (attached) that supports both English and Chromatic Fixed Do solfege, i.e. one can enter an E-flat major scale as either ef f g af bf c d ef or me fa sol le te do re me or any mixture of the two systems (but that way lies madness.) Cheers, Mike On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> wrote: > Another American here, but I don't have a very strong opinion on this. I > can > see arguments on both sides. > > -Paul > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/would-gn-for-G-natural-be-useful-in-language-english-tp165872p168834.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
english-solfa.ly
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
