Which functions fail? I'll try it here and see if it behaves the same way.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lucius, Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Error building Samba-3.0 > > > Interesting. Samba did compile using the 4e heimdal libs, but I get > segfaults for some of the functions. I reckon I'll need to > try the 0.6 > heimdal. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Error building Samba-3.0 > > > Our version of heimdal is a "hybrid" of 0.4e and 0.6. There > was a bug in > 0.4 that prevented password changing when used with an MIT KRB5 server > (missing authentication segment in the request). IBM > helped us fix it by lifting some code out of 0.6 and > backporting it into > 0.4e. > > In the process, it looks like we MIGHT have added AD > compatibility, but I'm > not sure yet. We have some test instances using pam_krb5 > against AD, and > one user reported he was able to change his AD > password through that mechanism, but I haven't verified it. > Authentication > works fine though. > > Samba builds just fine against this version of heimdal, and is > authenticating against AD, but it might be still using the > old NT mechanism. > I have to fiddle with it some more. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lucius, Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:10 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Error building Samba-3.0 > > > > > > So did you guys also update the heimdal package? According > > to the notes in > > the SuSE packaging directory, it "suggests" that this might > > be required. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:18 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Error building Samba-3.0 > > > > > > Yes, I reported this to SuSE as a bug, and they sent me a > > "patch" for it. > > > > Basically, you go into /usr/include/asm-s390/statfs.h and > > make the structure > > definition conditional, as in: > > > > #ifndef _SYS_STATFS_H > > struct statfs { > > long f_type; > > long f_bsize; > > long f_blocks; > > long f_bfree; > > long f_bavail; > > long f_files; > > long f_ffree; > > __kernel_fsid_t f_fsid; > > long f_namelen; > > long f_spare[6]; > > }; > > #endif > > > > I've built several versions of Samba, INCLUDING the 2.2.5 > > distributed with > > SLES8, and they all fail without this change. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Michael MacIsaac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:04 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [LINUX-390] Error building Samba-3.0 > > > > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > Has anyone run into a problem building the new Samba 3.0? > > > > > > I have a default SLES-8+SP2 system. I untar samba, go to > the source/ > > > directory, do a "./configure" with no parms and run "make". > > > For me it dies > > > with: > > > > > > Compiling dynconfig.c > > > In file included from /usr/include/asm/statfs.h:6, > > > from /usr/include/linux/vfs.h:4, > > > from /usr/include/linux/fs.h:13, > > > from /usr/include/linux/capability.h:17, > > > from /usr/include/sys/capability.h:24, > > > from include/includes.h:359, > > > from dynconfig.c:21: > > > /usr/include/asm-s390/statfs.h:20: redefinition of `struct statfs' > > > make: *** [dynconfig.o] Error 1 > > > > > > advTHANKSance. > > > > > > -Mike MacIsaac, IBM mikemac at us.ibm.com > > (845) 433-7061 > > > > > >
