On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 21:03 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > Both are examples of braindead ways to do things, > both originate from the same source. Dbus ties > jackd to the desktop and is just one more example > of the same insane evolution.
Indeed. I might be way off base, but what is wrong with the old school approach to changing daemons settings by getting it to re read a config file on SIGUSR1? Handle stdout by providing a couple of arguments that specify where to write the output (Think named pipes setup by whatever control interface cares). Dbus & XML for what should be a minimal system daemon running with RT priority? WTF? I have some reasonably mission critical things going on with jackd, the last thing I need on those boxes (one of which does not even have an X server) is integration with the desktop. Regards, Dan. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
