On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 15:15 -0400, Darren Landrum wrote: > Paul Davis wrote: > > Processing has wrapped a language with a lot *less* power than > > SuperCollider in a front end that is much easier to learn. Its a shame. > > But it also seems to be way the world works. > > So we would rather have a *more* powerful language wrapped in a front > end that is very difficult to learn? We already have that in spades, and > it's proven a good way to scare off people with good ideas who are not > skilled in coding enough (or patient enough) to get the most basic tasks > to work. > > What we need is a nice and powerful back-end that is wrapped in an > easy-to-learn front end. The best of both worlds, if it's possible.
Why do we need this? --p _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
