On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 16:44 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, David Robillard wrote: > > > pretty good idea. All that is needed as far as maintenance goes is for > > hosts to supply a simple turtle document that says "I implement foo and > > bar and baz extensions". The rest can be compiled into whatever fancy > > human readable form you want, for every single plugin out there, by a > > I would vote for XML for this, to better utilize all the parsers, > transformers, and presentation mechanisms already written and in place. > This isn't anti-turtle FUD, either. Turtle looks like it was a good > choice for the interface definitions.
No. Everything LV2 is Turtle. Using a different format would just be annoying and force the use of multiple technologies where one would do and is guaranteed to already be used. -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
