On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:15:25 +0100 [email protected] wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:05:51AM -0500, drew Roberts wrote: > > > Can CELT also do uncompressed or lossless? Otherwise limiting to CELT might > > not be such a good idea if I have followed things closely enough. > > From a soundcard I'd expect the full quality signal, > nothing less. And as most audio ADCs today are 24-bit, > I see no point in providing 8 or 16. Even 44.1 kHz > for me is something of the past, the only place where > it should be used is when mastering a CD.
I initially suggested 16bit because I thought it would be easier to manage in the prototype. For the same reason I suggested just 48kHz. I added the other terms into the spec. proposal simply so that the protocols remained open enough to cope with changes. > I've noted some other strange things. Why should a > soundcard be running Linux, or any other OS for that > matter ? > > Ciao, I've no idea what would be the best thing here, but surely there is a need for some sort of OS to enable the interpretation of incoming commands.Even the simplest would be a nightmare to implement in logic :o -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
