Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Folderol wrote: > >> Hmmm, >> Getting identical note and velocity is going to be quite common on >> sequencer generated stuff, so I would have thought this was rather >> undesirable. While there have been odd occasions when I've wished I >> could reliably re-create a pseudo random sequence, in general I would >> not want repeated identically created notes to sound exactly the same. > > Agreed... but apparently cal /does/ want that. :-)
Not quite. Over the last 12 months I've learned that I don't know enough about how zyn does its maths magic to try to change how it does it too radically. All I wanted was the same behavior as original zyn, but simpler code. One day I might get more adventurous, but I'm not there yet. Cheers. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
