Stop forking around On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:57 PM, drew Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote: > > i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects > > were forked > > This is not about what is going in in this thread in any direct way. (Or > may > not be at least, I do not know enough to say I guess.) > > What if I "fork" a project because I think it gives me a good starting > point > or base for what I want to do but the direction I intend to take things > will > result in a completely different sort of program to the one I forked? > Should > that still be considered a fork or is there another term for such a beast? > Would another term be useful? > > all the best, > > drew > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev > -- "Cheshire-Puss," she began, "would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?" "That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat. "I don't care much where--" said Alice. "Then it doesn't matter which way you go," said the Cat.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
