Am 5. März 2012 12:24 schrieb Fons Adriaensen <f...@linuxaudio.org>: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:55:39AM +0100, Albert Graef wrote: > >> Well, what you see as a problem, I see as a virtue. It gives me the >> flexibility to just pick my own set of messages for the application at >> hand. The sequencer shouldn't have to care about the particular set of >> OSC addresses I'm using. > > Agreed 100%. > > Agreed 40%
Having a standard scheeme for _standard procedures doesn't kill your freedom to still pick custom addresses / add your own extensions to OSC, but simplifies things A LOT for those 90% of users who do standard things, as playing back notes and controlling typical values (e.g. velocity, volume, resonance...) Thus you wouldn't lose any virtue, but those 90% woud gain some. -- E.R. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev