On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:08:10PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > You can partly blame me, I initially packaged this plugin for KXStudio > which made it more accessible for users. I should have a) checked the > source better and b) tested the resulting binary better as it doesn't > remotely do the job the way Zita-AT1 does. Partial comfort might be that > others probably recognized the flaws too and the package didn't survive > time. I'll see what I can do to have the remaining packages and source > code removed.
OK, thanks. What remains (and I don't blame you for that), is a bunch of users believing that zita-*** is crap. Even if someone some day writes a perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother to try it. > As for the violation of the license, don't give in to the Jeff Glatt's > of this world. I won't. Judging from hist posts on LM he must be a complete idiot. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
