"Ivica Ico Bukvic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Forgot to add that my assumption is (in addition to my previous > statement) if JACK was then running using reasonably small buffers > the drift would be then minimized if not alleviated since JACK is > one that is dispatching the buffers at appropriate time, right?
JACK expects there to be *no* drift and does *nothing* to manage this problem. It can only work with high-end cards using word-clock or other sample-accurate synchronization. Probably someone has succeeded with that (though I can't recall a specific report). -- joq
