On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:02:25AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/29/18 8:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> +static inline int nvme_next_ring_index(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 
> >> index)
> >> +{
> >> +  if (++index == nvmeq->q_depth)
> >> +          return 0;
> >> +
> >> +  return index;
> >> +}
> > 
> > This is unused now.
> 
> Huh, wonder how I missed that. GCC must not have complained.

gcc never warns about unused static inline functions.  Which makes a lot
of sense at least for headers..

> 
> > Also what about this little cleanup on top?
> 
> That looks good, I like it. With that, can I add your reviewed-by? I'll
> run a sanity check on it first.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>

Reply via email to