> > > I don't disagree, please do keep in mind that I'm not suggesting anyone > > > use this in production yet.
> > When it's in mainline I suspect people will start using it for that. > I think the larger question here is where we want development to happen. > I'm definitely not pretending that btrfs is perfect, but I strongly > believe that it will be a better filesystem if the development moves to > mainline where it will attract more eyeballs and more testers. One possibility would be to mimic ext4 and register the fs as "btrfsdev" until it's considered stable enough for production. I agree with the consensus that we want to use the upstream kernel as a nexus for coordinating btrfs development, so I don't think it's worth waiting a release or two to merge something. - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
