On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:44:34AM -0500, Ian! D. Allen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:15:49AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Ian! D. Allen <idal...@idallen.ca> wrote: > > > Still getting btrfsck errors with this: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git > > > unresolved ref root 256 dir 256 index 2 namelen 5 name snap1 error 600 > > > found 49152 bytes used err is 1 > > These is caused by a design flaw, you can safely ignore them. > > If it isn't an error, shouldn't btrfsck be ignoring it, not me? > At minimum it could say "warning" and not "err is 1".
Yes, it probably should, but there's not a great deal of point in fixing this particular issue, because Chris is working on the all-new (offline) repairing fsck, which should replace the current checking-only fsck very soon now. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- O tempura! O moresushi! ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
