On 6/12/14, 5:51 AM, David Sterba wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:14:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> This is a straight cut and paste from the util-linux >> mount manpage into btrfs-mount.5 >> >> It's pretty much impossible for util-linux to keep up >> with every filesystem out there, and Karel has more than >> once expressed a wish that mount options move into fs-specific >> manpages. >> >> So, here we go. >> >> The way btrfs asciidoc is generated, there's not a trivial >> way to have both btrfs(5) and btrfs(8) so I named it btrfs-mount(5) >> for now. A bit ick and I'm open to suggestions. > > So what if the mount options are generated from btrfs-mount.txt but > installed under btrfs.5.gz name? If there are more section 5 manpages we > can make it more generic but for now hardcoding btrfs-mount.* -> > btrfs.5. sounds ok to me.
Yeah, that seemed like kind of nasty hard-coding, but I suppose it works for now. I wanted to make it more generic, I didn't have a better idea.. -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
