On 7/24/14, 4:25 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On 06/25/2014 07:55 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> First off: total RFC, don't merge this; it builds, but >> is totally untested. >> >> open_ctree() is almost 1000 lines long. I've started trying >> to refactor it, primarily into helper functions, and also >> simplifying (?) things a bit at the beginning by removing the >> ret = func(); if (ret) { err = ret; goto ... } dance where it's not >> needed. >> >> Does this look like a reasonable thing to do? Have I cut >> things into the right chunks? Would you rather see it as >> as series of patches, moving one hunk of code at a time? > > I do love this patch, either as a series or one big patch. Whatever > makes it easiest for you to test is fine with me.
Oh right! I remember this thing! Let me try to get back to it... ;) Thanks, -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html