Am Sonntag, 11. September 2016, 18:27:30 CEST schrieben Sie: > What is the smallest recommended fs size for btrfs? > > - There are mentions of 256MB around the net. > - Gparted reserves minimum of 256MB for btrfs. > > With an ordinary partition on a single disk, > fs created with just "mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdxx": > - 128MB works fine. > - 127MB works but as if it is 64MB. > > Can we say size should be in multiples of 64MB?
Do you want to know the smalled *recommended* or the smallest *possible* size? I personally wouldn´t go below one or two GiB or or so with BTRFS. On small filesystems, I don´t know the treshold right now it uses a mixed metadata/data format. And I think using smaller BTRFS filesystem invited any left over "filesystem is full while it isn´t" issues. Well there we go. Excerpt from mkfs.btrfs(8) manpage: -M|--mixed Normally the data and metadata block groups are isolated. The mixed mode will remove the isolation and store both types in the same block group type. This helps to utilize the free space regardless of the purpose and is suitable for small devices. The separate allocation of block groups leads to a situation where the space is reserved for the other block group type, is not available for allocation and can lead to ENOSPC state. The recommended size for the mixed mode is for filesystems less than 1GiB. The soft recommendation is to use it for filesystems smaller than 5GiB. The mixed mode may lead to degraded performance on larger filesystems, but is otherwise usable, even on multiple devices. The nodesize and sectorsize must be equal, and the block group types must match. Note versions up to 4.2.x forced the mixed mode for devices smaller than 1GiB. This has been removed in 4.3+ as it caused some usability issues. Thanks -- Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html