On 2018/03/08 17:29, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On  6.03.2018 10:30, Misono, Tomohiro wrote:
>> Add new unprivileged ioctl (BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO) which searches
>> and returns only subvolume related item (ROOT_ITEM/ROOT_BACKREF/ROOT_REF)
>> from root tree. The arguments of this ioctl are the same as treesearch
>> ioctl and can be used like treesearch ioctl.
>>
>> Since treesearch ioctl requires root privilege, this ioctl is needed
>> to allow normal users to call "btrfs subvolume list/show" etc.
>>
>> Note that the subvolume name in ROOT_BACKREF/ROOT_REF will not be copied to
>> prevent potential name leak. The name can be obtained by calling
>> user version's ino_lookup ioctl (BTRFS_IOC_INO_LOOKUP_USER).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomoh...@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c           | 254 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h |   2 +
>>  2 files changed, 256 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> index 111ee282b777..1dba309dce31 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
>> @@ -1921,6 +1921,28 @@ static noinline int key_in_sk(struct btrfs_key *key,
>>      return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * check if key is in sk and subvolume related range
>> + */
>> +static noinline int key_in_sk_and_subvol(struct btrfs_key *key,
>> +                          struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk)
>> +{
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    ret = key_in_sk(key, sk);
>> +    if (!ret)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    if ((key->objectid == BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID ||
>> +            (key->objectid >= BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID &&
>> +             key->objectid <= BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID)) &&
> 
> Why do you need the FIRST_FREE/LAST_FREE object id checks? The range
> described by those are ordinary files. Since you are only interested in
> subvolume data then you should omit those, no?

There are ROOT_ITEM for other trees (EXTETN_TREE, DEV_TREE etc.) and they 
should be skipped.

> 
>> +        key->type >= BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY &&
>> +        key->type <= BTRFS_ROOT_BACKREF_KEY)
> I think this check should really be:
> 
> if (key->objectid == BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID || key->objectid ==
> BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY || key->type == BTRFS_ROOT_BACKREF_KEY
>>> +           return 1;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static noinline int copy_to_sk(struct btrfs_path *path,
>>                             struct btrfs_key *key,
>>                             struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk,
>> @@ -2045,6 +2067,142 @@ static noinline int copy_to_sk(struct btrfs_path 
>> *path,
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Basically the same as copy_to_sk() but restricts the copied item
>> + * within subvolume related one using key_in_sk_and_subvol().
>> + * Also, the name of subvolume will be omitted from
>> + * ROOT_BACKREF/ROOT_REF item.
>> + */
>> +static noinline int copy_subvol_item(struct btrfs_path *path,
>> +                           struct btrfs_key *key,
>> +                           struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk,
>> +                           size_t *buf_size,
>> +                           char __user *ubuf,
>> +                           unsigned long *sk_offset,
>> +                           int *num_found)
>> +{
>> +    u64 found_transid;
>> +    struct extent_buffer *leaf;
>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_search_header sh;
>> +    struct btrfs_key test;
>> +    unsigned long item_off;
>> +    unsigned long item_len;
>> +    int nritems;
>> +    int i;
>> +    int slot;
>> +    int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    leaf = path->nodes[0];
>> +    slot = path->slots[0];
>> +    nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
>> +
>> +    if (btrfs_header_generation(leaf) > sk->max_transid) {
>> +            i = nritems;
>> +            goto advance_key;
> 
> I don't see why you need a goto label at all. Just put the necessary
> code inside the if and return directly.

Most of this code is just copied from copy_to_sk().
I will rewrite code in more appropriate way in future version.

> 
>> +    }
>> +    found_transid = btrfs_header_generation(leaf);
>> +
>> +    for (i = slot; i < nritems; i++) {
>> +            item_off = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, i);
>> +            item_len = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, i);
>> +
>> +            btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, key, i);
>> +            if (!key_in_sk_and_subvol(key, sk))
>> +                    continue;
>> +
>> +            /* will not copy the name of subvolume */
>> +            if (key->type == BTRFS_ROOT_BACKREF_KEY ||
>> +                key->type == BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY)
>> +                    item_len = sizeof(struct btrfs_root_ref);
>> +
>> +            if (sizeof(sh) + item_len > *buf_size) {
>> +                    if (*num_found) {
>> +                            ret = 1;
>> +                            goto out;
>  This can be a simple return 1;
> 
> 
>> +                    }
>> +
>> +                    /*
>> +                     * return one empty item back for v1, which does not
>> +                     * handle -EOVERFLOW
>> +                     */
>> +
>> +                    *buf_size = sizeof(sh) + item_len;
>> +                    item_len = 0;
>> +                    ret = -EOVERFLOW;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (sizeof(sh) + item_len + *sk_offset > *buf_size) {
>> +                    ret = 1;
>> +                    goto out;
> ditto
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            sh.objectid = key->objectid;
>> +            sh.offset = key->offset;
>> +            sh.type = key->type;
>> +            sh.len = item_len;
>> +            sh.transid = found_transid;
>> +
>> +            /* copy search result header */
>> +            if (copy_to_user(ubuf + *sk_offset, &sh, sizeof(sh))) {
>> +                    ret = -EFAULT;
>> +                    goto out;
> ditto
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            *sk_offset += sizeof(sh);
>> +
>> +            if (item_len) {
>> +                    char __user *up = ubuf + *sk_offset;
>> +
>> +                    /* copy the item */
>> +                    if (read_extent_buffer_to_user(leaf, up,
>> +                                                   item_off, item_len)) {
>> +                            ret = -EFAULT;
>> +                            goto out;
> ditto
>> +                    }
>> +
>> +                    *sk_offset += item_len;
>> +            }
>> +            (*num_found)++;
>> +
>> +            if (ret) /* -EOVERFLOW from above */
>> +                    goto out;
> return ret
>> +
>> +            if (*num_found >= sk->nr_items) {
>> +                    ret = 1;
>> +                    goto out;
> return 1
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +advance_key:
>> +    ret = 0;
>> +    test.objectid = sk->max_objectid;
>> +    test.type = sk->max_type;
>> +    test.offset = sk->max_offset;
>> +    if (btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(key, &test) >= 0)
>> +            ret = 1;
>> +    else if (key->offset < (u64)-1)
>> +            key->offset++;
>> +    else if (key->type < (u8)-1) {
>> +            key->offset = 0;
>> +            key->type++;
>> +    } else if (key->objectid < (u64)-1) {
>> +            key->offset = 0;
>> +            key->type = 0;
>> +            key->objectid++;
>> +    } else
>> +            ret = 1;
>> +out:
> 
> Given that you are not doing any unwinding of locks or some such I don't
> see any reason for the label at all.
> 
>> +    /*
>> +     *  0: all items from this leaf copied, continue with next
>> +     *  1: * more items can be copied, but unused buffer is too small
>> +     *     * all items were found
>> +     *     Either way, it will stops the loop which iterates to the next
>> +     *     leaf
>> +     *  -EOVERFLOW: item was to large for buffer
>> +     *  -EFAULT: could not copy extent buffer back to userspace
>> +     */
> Put the description of the return value above the function definition
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static noinline int search_ioctl(struct inode *inode,
>>                               struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk,
>>                               size_t *buf_size,
>> @@ -2309,6 +2467,100 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup(struct 
>> file *file,
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static noinline int search_subvol(struct inode *inode,
>> +                             struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key *sk,
>> +                             size_t *buf_size,
>> +                             char __user *ubuf)
>> +{
>> +    struct btrfs_fs_info *info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
>> +    struct btrfs_root *root;
>> +    struct btrfs_key key;
>> +    struct btrfs_path *path;
>> +    unsigned long sk_offset = 0;
>> +    int num_found = 0;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    path = btrfs_alloc_path();
>> +    if (!path)
>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +    /* search ROOT TREEE */
>> +    key.objectid = BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID;
>> +    key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
>> +    key.offset = (u64)-1;
>> +    root = btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name(info, &key);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(root)) {
>> +            btrfs_free_path(path);
>> +            return -ENOENT;
>> +    }
> 
> So why do you have to do this, when you can just do :
> struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->tree_root;
> 
> Looking at the wider codebase, the root tree is referenced directly
> almost all the time. btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name is generally used when
> you have the objectid of a particular subvol root item and you want to
> get that one. But this is not the case here.
Ok, thanks.
Tomohiro Misono

> 
>> +
>> +    key.objectid = sk->min_objectid;
>> +    key.type = sk->min_type;
>> +    key.offset = sk->min_offset;
>> +
>> +    while (1) {
>> +            ret = btrfs_search_forward(root, &key, path, sk->min_transid);
>> +            if (ret != 0) {
>> +                    if (ret > 0)
>> +                            ret = 0;
>> +                    goto err;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            ret = copy_subvol_item(path, &key, sk, buf_size, ubuf,
>> +                             &sk_offset, &num_found);
>> +            btrfs_release_path(path);
>> +            if (ret)
>> +                    break;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (ret > 0)
>> +            ret = 0;
>> +err:
>> +    sk->nr_items = num_found;
>> +    btrfs_free_path(path);
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Unprivileged ioctl for getting subvolume related item.
>> + * The arguments are the same as btrfs_ioctl_tree_search()
>> + * and can be used like tree search ioctl.
>> + *
>> + * Only returns ROOT_ITEM/ROOT_BACKREF/ROOT_REF key of subvolumes
>> + * from root tree. Also, the name of subvolume will be omitted from
>> + * ROOT_BACKREF/ROOT_REF item to prevent name leak.
>> + */
>> +static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(struct file *file,
>> +                                       void __user *argp)
>> +{
>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args __user *uargs;
>> +    struct btrfs_ioctl_search_key sk;
>> +    struct inode *inode;
>> +    size_t buf_size;
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    uargs = (struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args __user *)argp;
>> +
>> +    if (copy_from_user(&sk, &uargs->key, sizeof(sk)))
>> +            return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> +    buf_size = sizeof(uargs->buf);
>> +
>> +    inode = file_inode(file);
>> +    ret = search_subvol(inode, &sk, &buf_size, uargs->buf);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * In the original implementation an overflow is handled by returning a
>> +     * search header with a len of zero, so reset ret.
>> +     */
>> +    if (ret == -EOVERFLOW)
>> +            ret = 0;
>> +
>> +    if (ret == 0 && copy_to_user(&uargs->key, &sk, sizeof(sk)))
>> +            ret = -EFAULT;
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file *file,
>>                                           void __user *arg)
>>  {
>> @@ -5663,6 +5915,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
>>              return btrfs_ioctl_get_features(file, argp);
>>      case BTRFS_IOC_SET_FEATURES:
>>              return btrfs_ioctl_set_features(file, argp);
>> +    case BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO:
>> +            return btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(file, argp);
>>      }
>>  
>>      return -ENOTTY;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
>> index c8d99b9ca550..1e9361cf66d5 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h
>> @@ -843,5 +843,7 @@ enum btrfs_err_code {
>>                                 struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2)
>>  #define BTRFS_IOC_LOGICAL_INO_V2 _IOWR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 59, \
>>                                      struct btrfs_ioctl_logical_ino_args)
>> +#define BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUBVOL_INFO _IOWR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 60, \
>> +                                    struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args)
>>  
>>  #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_BTRFS_H */
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to