On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:16:21 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <piastr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/9/12 Jeff Layton <jlay...@samba.org>:
> > This should probably be a set of patches that outlines each change.
> > There are 3, AFAICT:
>
> Ok, no problem with this, I will post it soon.
>
> > 1) it bypasses the cache for reads when we have no oplock. Seems
> > straightforward.
> >
> > 2) the cache is invalidated on close. So, no caching of data between
> > open and close. Again ugly for performance but good for strict cache
> > consistency.
> >
> > 3) write_end is doing a single page synchronous write when there is no
> > oplock. This is going to be really ugly. Anytime you don't have an
> > oplock, you'll be doing PAGE_SIZE writes to the server. Why not instead
> > simply have cifs_file_aio_write do a filemap_write_and_wait or
> > something if it there is no oplock?
>
> I think I didn't understand you in this case. Let's look on the code:
>
> 1622 >-------if (!PageUptodate(page) || !CIFS_I(inode)->clientCanCacheAll) {
> 1623 >------->-------char *page_data;
> 1624 >------->-------unsigned offset = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
> 1625 >------->-------int xid;
> 1626
> 1627 >------->-------xid = GetXid();
> 1628 >------->-------/* this is probably better than directly calling
> 1629 >------->------- partialpage_write since in this function the
> file handle is
> 1630 >------->------- known which we might as well>leverage */
> 1631 >------->-------/* BB check if anything else missing out of ppw
> 1632 >------->------- such as updating last write time */
> 1633 >------->-------page_data = kmap(page);
> 1634 >------->-------rc = cifs_write(file, page_data + offset, copied, &pos);
>
> We are writing 'copied' bytes from 'offset' of 'page_data'. Why do you
> think that we are doing PAGE_SIZE write to the server?
>
> 1635 >------->-------/* if (rc < 0) should we set writebehind rc? */
> 1636 >------->-------kunmap(page);
> 1637
> 1638 >------->-------FreeXid(xid);
> 1639 >-------} else {
>
write_begin/write_end are called on each page in a write syscall. So if
your application is writing in 64k page-aligned chunks, write_end will
be called 16 times. When you have no oplock with this patch, for each
call to write_end, you're calling cifs_write which will flush each
single page synchronously and only that single page to the server. Your
64k write will take 16 round trips to the server to complete.
What you probably want to do instead is populate the pagecache with the
write contents (as is done today), flush the write and wait on the
result. Optionally, you could then invalidate the cache to free up the
pagecache pages (though you'll need to take care not to race with other
writers).
--
Jeff Layton <jlay...@samba.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
