On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:19:56 -0500
Steve French <smfre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:18:32 +0530
> > Suresh Jayaraman <sjayara...@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/13/2010 11:32 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >> > cifs_get_smb_ses must be called on a server pointer on which it holds an
> >> > active reference. It first does a search for an existing SMB session. If
> >> > it finds one, it'll put the server reference and then try to ensure that
> >> > the negprot is done, etc.
> >> >
> >> > If it encounters an error at that point then it'll return an error.
> >> > There's a potential problem here though. When cifs_get_smb_ses returns
> >> > an error, the caller will also put the TCP server reference leading to a
> >> > double-put.
> >> >
> >> > Fix this by having cifs_get_smb_ses only put the server reference if
> >> > it found an existing session that it could use and isn't returning an
> >> > error.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > fs/cifs/connect.c | 6 +++---
> >> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> >> > index 67dad54..88c84a3 100644
> >> > --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> >> > +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> >> > @@ -1706,9 +1706,6 @@ cifs_get_smb_ses(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
> >> > struct smb_vol *volume_info)
> >> > if (ses) {
> >> > cFYI(1, "Existing smb sess found (status=%d)", ses->status);
> >> >
> >> > - /* existing SMB ses has a server reference already */
> >> > - cifs_put_tcp_session(server);
> >> > -
> >> > mutex_lock(&ses->session_mutex);
> >> > rc = cifs_negotiate_protocol(xid, ses);
> >> > if (rc) {
> >> > @@ -1731,6 +1728,9 @@ cifs_get_smb_ses(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
> >> > struct smb_vol *volume_info)
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> > mutex_unlock(&ses->session_mutex);
> >> > +
> >> > + /* existing SMB ses has a server reference already */
> >> > + cifs_put_tcp_session(server);
> >> > FreeXid(xid);
> >> > return ses;
> >> > }
> >>
> >> Looks correct to me.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayara...@suse.de>
> >
> > Thanks. In hindsight, I should have probably sent this to stable too.
> >
> > Steve, would you like me to resend and cc stable? We probably want this
> > in 2.6.36 too, if possible.
>
> Yes - I agree makes sense. Any other candidate patches for 2.6.36?
>
No, that's all I've got for now. I'll resend in a bit and cc stable.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
