On 03/04/2015 06:57 AM, yjin wrote:
> An alternative is moving the definitions to a ".c" file, but I don't
> think it will be fundamental different.
> I know I am fixing a potential error which doesn't exist now, it seems
> useless for the current upstream version, we can abandon my patch. But I
> still think the current implementation adds unnecessary restrictions for
> its users.

I think that both dma_map_sg_chained and dma_unmap_sg_chained should go
away. They were added to support chained scatterlists, but as far as I
verified, dma_map_sg should handle that case as well.

Kim, can you confirm this?

Cristian S.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to