On 12/27/2016 10:58 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:08:48AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
According to Daniel, the networking folks want to let embedded systems
include BPF without requiring the crypto core.
Last I checked the IPv4 stack depended on the crypto API so this
sounds bogus.
I think there's a bit of a mixup here with what I said. To clarify,
requirement back then from tracing folks was that bpf engine and
therefore bpf syscall can be build w/o networking enabled for small
devices, so dependencies preferably need to be kept on a absolute
minimum, same counts for either making it suddenly a depend on
CRYPTO or a select CRYPTO for just those few lines that can be
pulled in from lib/ code instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
