Am Freitag, 21. April 2017, 09:57:56 BRT schrieb Mimi Zohar:
> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:40 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > @@ -949,49 +936,16 @@ void ima_policy_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > 
> >  #define pt(token)  policy_tokens[token + Opt_err].pattern
> >  #define mt(token)  mask_tokens[token]
> > 
> > -#define ft(token)  func_tokens[token]
> > 
> >  /*
> >  
> >   * policy_func_show - display the ima_hooks policy rule
> >   */
> >  
> >  static void policy_func_show(struct seq_file *m, enum ima_hooks func)
> >  {
> > 
> > -   char tbuf[64] = {0,};
> > -
> > -   switch (func) {
> > -   case FILE_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_file));
> > -           break;
> > -   case MMAP_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_mmap));
> > -           break;
> > -   case BPRM_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_bprm));
> > -           break;
> > -   case MODULE_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_module));
> > -           break;
> > -   case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_firmware));
> > -           break;
> > -   case POST_SETATTR:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_post));
> > -           break;
> > -   case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_kexec_kernel));
> > -           break;
> > -   case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_kexec_initramfs));
> > -           break;
> > -   case POLICY_CHECK:
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), ft(func_policy));
> > -           break;
> > -   default:
> > -           snprintf(tbuf, sizeof(tbuf), "%d", func);
> > -           seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_func), tbuf);
> > -           break;
> > -   }
> > -   seq_puts(m, " ");
> > +   if (func > 0 && func < MAX_CHECK)
> > +           seq_printf(m, "func=%s ", func_tokens[func]);
> > +   else
> > +           seq_printf(m, "func=%d ", func);
> 
> The only time this can happen is when __kernel_read_file_id() is
> updated without updating the read_idmap[].  Perhaps we can display the
> number and the appropriate __kernel_read_file_id string.

>From what I understood of the code func comes from ima_parse_rule, so that 
condition would only happen if ima_parse_rule got out of sync with 
func_tokens. Since that code only initializes func with constants from enum 
ima_hooks and this patch makes ima_hooks automatically sync with func_tokens, 
the else branch is more like a "can't happen" safety net.

read_idmap is only used in ima_post_read_file, and I couldn't see a relation 
between that code path and the one for ima_policy_show.

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

Reply via email to