On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote: > The punch was in response to this statement, which I personally found > fairly infuriating: > >>> I more or less agree with you that we should just turn this on for all >>> users and they'll just have to live with the spam and report odd >>> entries, and overtime we'll fix all the violations.
Holy cow, please cool it. I think the "or less" part was relevant, as was the subsequent sentence which characterized that sentiment as "hubris". Also, the subsequent email when I made explicit the fact that I was more in agreement with you than you interpreted. So, in case you're really really really not getting the message I'm trying to make so explicitly clear to you: I AGREE WITH YOU. So, no more punching, pretty please? > > There seems to be a fundamental misapprehension that it will be easy > to "fix all the violations". I don't think it will be easy. I agree with you. > But for other > platforms, it really, REALLY isn't that easy to fix. Other platforms will be hard. I agree with you. > So personally, I think I'm going to roll Kees' suggestion into a PATCH and send it to you. You can decide if you want to apply it. I'll be satisfied with whatever you choose and will follow your lead. Jason
