On Apr 20, 2007  09:57 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Anyway, how about something like this for calculating journal size in 
> the face of lazy_bg.  I know the last group may be smaller... but I figure
> this is just a heuristic anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Index: e2fsprogs-1.39_ext4_hg/misc/util.c
> ===================================================================
> --- e2fsprogs-1.39_ext4_hg.orig/misc/util.c
> +++ e2fsprogs-1.39_ext4_hg/misc/util.c
> @@ -252,8 +252,16 @@ void parse_journal_opts(const char *opts
>  int figure_journal_size(int size, ext2_filsys fs)
>  {
>       blk_t j_blocks;
> +     blk_t fs_size;
>  
> -     if (fs->super->s_blocks_count < 2048) {
> +     if (EXT2_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(fs->super, 
> +                                 EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_LAZY_BG)) {
> +             fs_size = fs->super->s_blocks_per_group * 2; 
> +     } else {
> +             fs_size = fs->super->s_blocks_count;
> +     }

This should also check for !RO_COMPAT_UNINIT_GROUPS, since LAZY_BG
can be used in conjunction with UNINIT_GROUPS to mean "don't zero
uninitialized groups" but doesn't set bg_free_blocks_count == 0.

I was going to suggest using s_free_blocks_count, but that might
lead to confusion if e.g. e2fsck deletes a journal on a nearly-full
fs and then tune2fs recreates it much smaller than before.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to