> Michael Tautschnig <m...@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Could you just briefly explain when it was broken (and maybe give some more
> > hints on what was wrong - the comment "# not usable for /boot" looked like a
> > pretty concious one). Obviously I could just find out myself, but I just 
> > assume
> > you already know all this and it might be way easier for you :-) - thanks!!
> 
> I have no idea. It got merged like that, with this bogus code. The /boot
> case is handled in the code in the same way it's handled for other
> things.
> 
> I have really no idea where this came from, so if anyone knows... I'd be
> glad to know.
> 

Omg, this was/is caused by an interaction of patches. I'll give you more details
after lunch.

Best,
Michael

Attachment: pgpqeVu0VH0Rl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to