On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 01:26 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote: > * Stephan Adig <s...@sourcecode.de> [Thu Feb 17, 2011 at 12:20:08PM +0100]: > > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:13 +0100, Michael Goetze wrote: > > > On 02/16/2011 05:47 PM, Michael Prokop wrote: > > > > * Michael Goetze <mgoe...@mgoetze.net> [Wed Feb 16, 2011 at 05:16:54PM > > > > +0100]: > > > >> Possible candidate: > > > >> * svn r6278: GRUB1 is in package "grub-legacy", not "grub" > > > > > Hm, sounds reasonable. But that wouldn't work on releases older than > > > > squeeze, nor? > > > > Right, but presently this class works ONLY on releases older than > > > squeeze. :( > > Jepp, we clearly have to fix this. > > > So let's update the simple examples to match newer needs. > > Adding new classes for DEBIAN_NEW / DEBIAN_OLD etc. > > DEBIAN_NEW / DEBIAN_OLD sounds like no one knows what he'll get, > nor? :) >
Well, that was this morning, i didn't had a coffee ;) > What about providing class names matching the Debian releases, like > ETCH/LENNY/SQUEEZE/....? How this affect for example Ubuntu? ETCH/LENNY/SQUEEZE/UBUNTU_LUCID/UBUNTU_NATTY/UBUNTU_KARMIC etc.sounds more sane. Regards, \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Adig SysAdmin / Ubuntu Developer xmpp: s...@sourcecode.de