* Michael Tautschnig [Thu May 12, 2011 at 11:30:55AM +0100]: > > After reading just the changelog I doubt they let it in :-) (But do try!)
> > But, two of the closed important bugs (from the bts) still seem worthwhile > > fixing in stable... (offline atm, so I cannot look up the numbers.) > I've only now reviewed the changelog myself and indeed the number of changes > is > pretty large with clearly not all of them being important or serious bugs, let > alone them being reported to the Debian BTS as such. Yet still almost all > changes are bugfixes, only get-config-dir-http and the align-at stuff in > setup-storage are new features. But then again the former is non-intrusive (it > won't change anything for setups not using http) and the align-at is important > for current hardware to ensure efficient operation. > I think the main problem for the release team will be that the changes are so > wide-spread that reviewing could be pretty painful, especially for people not > into FAI. We should clearly warn the release team about that, I don't want to > waste their time, let alone annoy them. We should be ready to gently lend > them a > hand and possibly talk them through the changes. Seconded. :) If anyone volunteers to prepare a mail to the release team please do so and share so we can join the party. :) regards, -mika- -- http://michael-prokop.at/ || http://adminzen.org/ http://grml-solutions.com/ || http://grml.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature