* Michael Tautschnig [Thu May 12, 2011 at 11:30:55AM +0100]:

> > After reading just the changelog I doubt they let it in :-) (But do try!)

> > But, two of the closed important bugs (from the bts) still seem worthwhile 
> > fixing in stable... (offline atm, so I cannot look up the numbers.)

> I've only now reviewed the changelog myself and indeed the number of changes 
> is
> pretty large with clearly not all of them being important or serious bugs, let
> alone them being reported to the Debian BTS as such. Yet still almost all
> changes are bugfixes, only get-config-dir-http and the align-at stuff in
> setup-storage are new features. But then again the former is non-intrusive (it
> won't change anything for setups not using http) and the align-at is important
> for current hardware to ensure efficient operation.

> I think the main problem for the release team will be that the changes are so
> wide-spread that reviewing could be pretty painful, especially for people not
> into FAI. We should clearly warn the release team about that, I don't want to
> waste their time, let alone annoy them. We should be ready to gently lend 
> them a
> hand and possibly talk them through the changes.

Seconded. :)

If anyone volunteers to prepare a mail to the release team
please do so and share so we can join the party. :)

regards,
-mika-
-- 
http://michael-prokop.at/  || http://adminzen.org/
http://grml-solutions.com/ || http://grml.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to