Re: Meaning of blk_size

[Daniel Phillips]

Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> After staring at the block device code for, um, quite a long time, I
> came to the conclusion that blk_size stores one less than the number of
> 512 byte blocks on a device.  Is this true?

Um, slight revision: they wouldn't be blocks, they'd be 'sectors', and
there is a magic shift-by-one in the code I'm looking at, implying 256
byte units.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]