Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:04:21PM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > After quite a lot of grepping in 2.4.0-test10 I was unable to find any > > places where address_mapping->host is not (struct inode *) - are there > > any? > > I can't find one. This change was requested some time ago (Mai 2000 or so) > by Roman Shaposhnick to easify his p9fs implementation. 'This change' meaning what? Making -> (void *) ? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Is address_mapping->host always (struct inode *)? Daniel Phillips
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always (struct inod... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always (struct ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always (struct inod... Alexander Viro
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always (struct ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always (str... Alexander Viro
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always (str... Steve Lord
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Is address_mapping->host al... Steve Lord
- Re: Is address_mapping->hos... Alexander Viro
- Re: Is address_mapping->... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Is address_mapping->... Alexander Viro
- Re: Is address_mapping->host always ... Daniel Phillips