Hi, sure no problem we can name it firebird. Packaging it with the firebird packages I don't really find a good idea, because not every user that needs firebird 2.5 will use it in a cluster. Therefore I would appreciate it if it would be packages with the pacemaker package, if that package includes all the ocf RA's.
Thanks again for the support. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Florian Haas <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks. One more minor issue: does it have to be named "firebird25"? If > it's called just "firebird", then it's fine for it to support version > only 2.5 forward -- but you won't need to rename when 2.x for x>5 comes > out. > > An additional option would be to package this with Firebird, of course. > > Cheers, > Florian > > On 2010-11-24 17:33, Frank Lazzarini wrote: > > Hi Florian, > > > > thanks a lot for your quick reply, I fixed those little errors and added > > a little feature that checks if the /var/run/firebird directory is > > writeable by the OCF_RESKEY_user or not. > > > > Hope this is better :) > > > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > >
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
