On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/09/2010 10:45 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 2010-12-07 22:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Folks, >>>>> >>>>> shamefully we've had a resource agent contribution sitting around in the >>>>> LF bugzilla for almost 2 1/2 years without acting on it. It's an >>>>> alternative implementation of an Apache httpd resource agent: >>>>> >>>>> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1943 >>>>> >>>>> (I just renamed the bug, previously it was something totally misleading >>>>> about Debian lenny.) >>>>> >>>>> Any objections to getting this RA into decent late-2010 shape and adding >>>>> it to the repo as ocf:heartbeat:apache2? >>>> >>>> Please, not a repeat of ipaddr. >>>> Can we not replace the old one and include some compatibility code >>>> (that we can remove eventually)? >>> >>> I believe you sat across the table from me when we discussed resource >>> agent deprecation? Both apache and IPaddr are storybook examples for that. >> >> Thats fine, but you didn't actually say that you planned for the >> existing one to be deprecated. > > Oh sorry, I thought the implication was obvious. :) > >> Here's a thought, why dont we hold off a fraction longer and put this >> one in the "new combined" namespace and thus avoid needing the 2 >> suffix forevermore. > > Hm. Well I think I'll grudgingly agree. Since we've already let this sit > on the shelf for two years, I guess two more months or so doesn't make > much difference...
Yeah, might be something we want to think about creating a strategy for though. Not every day will we be opening up a new namespace _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
