Hi,

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:16:57PM -0300, Federico Castro wrote:
> Great! Thanks for your tips. I found the problem.
> 
> Bad substitution error in line 1646
> 
> L1646: sed -i "/${rep_mode_string//\//\\/}/d" $OCF_RESKEY_config
> 
> was when trying to delete string "include
> '/var/lib/pgsql/tmp/rep_mode.conf' # added by pgsql RA’” in my config file
> "/etc/postgresql/9.1/main/postgresql.conf”
> 
> It was caused because Debian 7 /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/dash (/bin/sh
> -> dash) and substitution is not working there, I changed script
> interpreter to bash and it is working.

You should report this at github.com (or open bug with Debian).
It looks like a bashism and pgsql is a POSIX shell.

Thanks,

Dejan

> Thanks again.
> 
> 
> 2014-09-12 3:13 GMT-03:00 Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de>:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > my hints were for debugging your own RA, but you can also debug other
> > people's RAs. Consider this script I wrote for one of my own RAs:
> > (blocktune-test.sh)
> > #RA=/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/xola/blocktune
> > RA=./blocktune
> > if [ "$1" = "manual" ]; then
> >     shift
> >     OCF_ROOT=/usr/lib/ocf OCF_RESOURCE_INSTANCE=blocktune \
> >         OCF_RESKEY_blockdev="loop0" \
> >         OCF_RESKEY_parameter="queue/scheduler" \
> >         OCF_RESKEY_onvalue="noop" \
> >         OCF_RESKEY_offvalue="cfq" \
> >         sh -x $RA "$@"
> >     echo "Exit status is $?"
> > else
> >     /usr/sbin/ocf-tester -n multipath \
> >         -o blockdev="loop0" \
> >         -o parameter="queue/scheduler" \
> >         -o onvalue="noop" \
> >         -o offvalue="cfq" \
> >         $RA
> > fi
> > ---
> > Note the "sh -x"! You'd use "./blocktune-test.sh manual
> > start/stop/status/whatever" to test a single operation, and without
> > parameters the usual ocf-tester would be used.
> > I guess you get the idea of how to adjust my sample script for your needs.
> > Hint: If you have installed the RA you should use the official path; other
> > wise use the RA in the current directory
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ulrich
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to