On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 19:52 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:06:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This may appear as PCI or ACPI depending upon the firmware so we
> > have to list both. All share the same ACPI identifier but not
> > the same PCI identifier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <a...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > index 3356f7a..d31d313 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c
> > @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ static struct dw_pci_controller dw_pci_controllers[] =
> > {
> > .scl_sda_cfg = &hsw_config,
> > },
> > };
> > +
> > static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
> > .master_xfer = i2c_dw_xfer,
> > .functionality = i2c_dw_func,
> > @@ -350,6 +351,14 @@ static const struct pci_device_id
> > i2_designware_pci_ids[] = {
> > /* Haswell */
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9c61), haswell },
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9c62), haswell },
> > + /* Braswell / Cherrytrail */
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C1), baytrail,},
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C2), baytrail },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C3), baytrail },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C4), baytrail },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C5), baytrail },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C6), baytrail },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x22C7), baytrail },
> > { 0,}
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, i2_designware_pci_ids);
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > index 402ec39..915ce6c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[]
> > = {
> > { "INT3432", 0 },
> > { "INT3433", 0 },
> > { "80860F41", 0 },
> > + { "808622C1", 0 },
>
> Why are 22c2 up to 22c7 not added here?
> This may appear as PCI or ACPI depending upon the firmware so we
> > have to list both. All share the same ACPI identifier but not
> > the same PCI identifier.
> >
In PCI enumeration you have
808622C1, 808622C2, 808622C3 etc
but if ACPI enumerated then
808622C1 #1, 808622C1 #2, 8086 22C1 #3 etc
Hope that makes sense ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
