Hello,

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 03:32:33PM +0800, Gao Pan wrote:
> In our former i2c driver, i2c clk is enabled and disabled in
> xfer function, which contributes to power saving. However,
> the clk enable process brings a busy wait delay until the core
> is stable. As a result, the performance is sacrificed.
> 
> To weigh the power consumption and i2c bus performance, runtime
> pm is the good solution for it. The clk is enabled when a i2c
> transfer starts, and disabled after a specifically defined delay.
> 
> Without the patch the test case (many eeprom reads) executes with approx:
> real 1m7.735s
> user 0m0.488s
> sys 0m20.040s
> 
> With the patch the same test case (many eeprom reads) executes with approx:
> real 0m54.241s
> user 0m0.440s
> sys 0m5.920s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <b38...@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Pan <b54...@freescale.com>
> [wsa: fixed some indentation]
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de>
Hmm, why does this already have a S-o-b from Wolfram?

Other than that I don't have any caveats to enter any more, but given
that I don't have much clue about runtime pm this doesn't mean much.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to