* Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But! I used hdparm -t solely, 2.6 was always ~5% faster than 2.4. But
> using -Tt slowed down the hd speed by about 30%. So it looks like some
> scheduler interaction, perhaps the memory timing loops gets it marked
> as batch or something?
to check whether that could be the case, could you try:
nice -n -20 hdparm -t /dev/hdc
does that produce different results?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
