--- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, it's a good idea to maintain one qc to one ATA/ATAPI command
> mapping as long as possible. And, in the suggested framework, it's
Yes, that makes sense.
> guaranteed that no other command can come inbetween CHECK_SENSE and
> REQUEST_SENSE.
That's good.
> Requesting sense from EH,
Done in an ATA eh handler.
> calling scsi_decide_disposition() on the
> sense
Done in SCSI Core.
> and following the verdict should achieve the same effect as
> emulating autosense.
Yes, precisely.
> Is there any compelling reason to break one qc to
> one command mapping?
?
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
