On 09/01/05 18:23, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:07 -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
>>>Well, not really, since it's basic SCSI and the explanation's pretty
>>>long. However, the standards have several pages about it. For your
>>>reading pleasure, I suggest SAM-2 section 5.9.1 Contingent allegiance
>>>(CA) and auto contingent allegiance (ACA)
>>
>>SCSI Core knows nothing about ACA and/or how to use it.
>
>
> I don't recall ever claiming that it did. The discussion was about how
> the error handler clears contingent allegiance conditions.
:-)
So are you claiming that
"the error handler clears contingent allegiance conditions" ?
Please point me to the lines in the source code where it does this
and how it does it.
>>You should also know that no one actually spells out CA or ACA,
>>they just use the capitalized abbreviation, plus the fact that
>>CA is obsolete.
>
>
> Lets just say I'm TLA averse.
>
>
>>Stop impressing the children!
>
>
> Is that what people who constantly refer to standards are trying to do?
> I must say I did wonder ...
Yes, there's a bunch of us here, count DG too.
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
