Hello.

Albert Lee wrote:
patch 2/2:
  Do the dma status clearing in ide_intr() and add a new 
hwif->ide_dma_clear_irq such that LLDD could override it.

Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Tested ok on ICH4 and pdc20275. Not sure if this would have bad effect for 
other adapters.

Patch against 2.6.20-rc5, for your review, thanks.

diff -Nrup 01_remove_from_ide_cd/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c 
02_add_to_ide_intr/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
--- 01_remove_from_ide_cd/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c 2006-11-30 05:57:37.000000000 
+0800
+++ 02_add_to_ide_intr/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c    2007-01-24 11:07:58.000000000 
+0800
@@ -650,6 +650,22 @@ static int __ide_dma_test_irq(ide_drive_
                        drive->name, __FUNCTION__);
        return 0;
 }
+
+/* returns 1 on error, 0 otherwise */

   Why? Do you check the result?

+int __ide_dma_clear_irq(ide_drive_t *drive)
+{
+       ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
+       u8 dma_stat;
+
+       /* clear the INTR & ERROR bits */
+       if (hwif->dma_status) {

hwif->dma_status should always be set, else ide-dma.c just won't work. The check seems superfluous.

+               dma_stat = hwif->INB(hwif->dma_status);
+               /* Should we force the bit as well ? */

   Good idea.

+               hwif->OUTB(dma_stat, hwif->dma_status);

I'm afraid this would break __ide_dma_end() function which tests the error conditions and returns failure if (dma_stat & 7) != 4...

+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI */
int __ide_dma_bad_drive (ide_drive_t *drive)
diff -Nrup 01_remove_from_ide_cd/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 
02_add_to_ide_intr/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
--- 01_remove_from_ide_cd/drivers/ide/ide-io.c  2006-11-30 05:57:37.000000000 
+0800
+++ 02_add_to_ide_intr/drivers/ide/ide-io.c     2007-01-24 11:21:41.000000000 
+0800
@@ -1644,6 +1644,18 @@ irqreturn_t ide_intr (int irq, void *dev
        }
        hwgroup->handler = NULL;
        del_timer(&hwgroup->timer);
+
+       /* Some controllers might set DMA INTR no matter DMA or PIO;
+        * bmdma status might need to be cleared even for
+        * PIO interrupts to prevent spurious irq or irq lost.
+        */

   Either "being lost" or "loss". Sorry for grammar nitpicking. :-)

+       if (hwif->ide_dma_clear_irq && !(hwif->dma))
+               /* ide_dma_end() needs bmdma status for error checking.
+                * So, skip clearing bmdma status here and leave it
+                * to ide_dma_end() if this is dma interrupt.
+                */
+               hwif->ide_dma_clear_irq(drive);
+
        spin_unlock(&ide_lock);

Ah, you're only calling this when hwif->dma == 0... Well, that's probably fine. Although, once introduced, this method asks for more use...

        if (drive->unmask)

MBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to