Hello, Albert. Albert Lee wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: >> Also, this is a problem for not only IDENTIFY but all polling commands. > > Yes, other command might also assert INTRQ during polling. > However, for the specific BENQ DW1620 drive, only IDENTIFY_PACKET_DEVICE > has such behavior; other commands like READ or REQUEST_SENSE are ok.
Oh I see. >> One solution I can think of is to let IRQ handler ack IRQ >> unconditionally during polling commands - ie. just read the TF Status >> register once and tell the IRQ subsystem that the IRQ is handled. This >> shouldn't affect the operation of polling as the only side effect of >> reading Status is clearing pending IRQ && will give us a nice way to >> deal with the SATA bridge chip which chokes on nIEN. Considering the >> sorry state of nIEN in SATA, I guess this might be the best way to deal >> with this. >> >> Albert, can you please test whether this works? Modifying >> ata_interrupt() such that it reads TF Status if ATA_TFLAG_POLLING should >> do the trick. > > Yes, reading the Status register and acking interrupt also fixes the > problem (patch attached below). Good to know it works. With or without nIEN, I think this change is a good thing to have. IRQ handler shouldn't interfere with polling as both acquire lock during operation. Polling is safer this way and non-SFF drivers are doing something similar anyway. I also think it would be nice to have the SFF irq_handler clear IRQ while the port is frozen. This again is the default behavior of non-SFF drivers. Any objections? -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
