Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
There's no reason to have the speedproc() method wrapper for the two quite different chip families, so just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
applied
I forgot to notice/mention the side effect: there would be no speedproc() method installed if hwif->dma_base happens to be 0.
MBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
