Alan Cox wrote:
Correct, but it is also extremely slow. No point discussing fast paths
for odd if() tests through the code when you burn 100nS unneccessarily
every time you issue a command via PIO is there.
BTW if you wanna start PIO speed tuning, ISTR the device-select code
does not cache selections. We always unconditionally select a device
before a command in ata_qc_issue_prot(), IIRC.
ISTR for some cases this was intentional (following ATADRVR) but I bet
adding code to -not- select a device, if it is already selected, would
speed things up on slow PATA machines.
ata_qc_issue_prot() and ata_dev_select() would be starting points if
you're interested.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
