Re: [PATCH 2.6.22-rc7] libata: fix assigned IRQ reporting

[Tejun Heo]

Francois Romieu wrote:
> Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
>> Apparently, I'm more confused than you are.  My "master" was at 872aad45
>> but my index was at rc7.  Can you please force checkout the head and
>> re-test?  I've tested both native and legacy modes and it's fixed here.
> 
> I have done a forced checkout + mrproper before rebuild and there is no
> difference.
> 
> Complete dmesg is attached.

Hmmmm... Weird.  Can you please apply the attached patch and post boot
dmesg?  Thanks.

-- 
tejun

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index fa1c22c..1a5bd75 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ int ata_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
                rc = devm_request_irq(dev, pdev->irq, pi->port_ops->irq_handler,
                                      IRQF_SHARED, DRV_NAME, host);
                host->irq = pdev->irq;
+               printk("XXX native mode irq=%lu\n", host->irq);
        } else {
                irq_handler_t handler[2] = { host->ops->irq_handler,
                                             host->ops->irq_handler };
@@ -1076,6 +1077,7 @@ int ata_pci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
                void *dev_id[2] = { host, host };
 
                rc = ata_request_legacy_irqs(host, handler, irq_flags, dev_id);
+               printk("XXX legacy mode irq=%lu irq2=%lu\n", host->irq, 
host->irq2);
        }
        if (rc)
                goto err_out;