Em Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:42:50 +0900
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| HDS724040KLSA80 reports that it supports HPA && LBA48 but craps itself
| on READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT. Implement BROKEN_HPA horkage and apply it to
| the drive. If the horkage is set, all HPA operations are skipped.
|
| While at it, make HPA test a bit more reliable by also checking
| ata_id_has_hpa().
Tejun, is the following patch ok for 2.6.22.1?
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,8 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device
dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_FLUSH_EXT;
}
- if (ata_id_hpa_enabled(dev->id))
+ if (!(dev->horkage & ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA) &&
+ ata_id_has_hpa(id) && ata_id_hpa_enabled(dev->id))
dev->n_sectors = ata_hpa_resize(dev);
/* config NCQ */
@@ -3800,6 +3801,7 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry
{ "HTS541612J9SA00", "SBDIC7JP", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
{ "Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00", "SB4OC70P", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
{ "WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
+ { "HDS724040KLSA80", "KFAOA20N", ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA, },
/* Devices with NCQ limits */
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/include/linux/libata.h
+++ linux-2.6.22/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ enum {
ATA_HORKAGE_NODMA = (1 << 1), /* DMA problems */
ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ = (1 << 2), /* Don't use NCQ */
ATA_HORKAGE_MAX_SEC_128 = (1 << 3), /* Limit max sects to 128 */
+ ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA = (1 << 4), /* Broken HPA */
};
enum hsm_task_states {
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
