Em Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:21:08 +0900 Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| Alan Cox wrote: | >>> I'd rather know what is going on here. A drive can legitimately | >>> support LBA48 and HPA and refuse READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT. | >> READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT is mandatory if HPA && LBA48, no | > | > Ok the report in that thread is different. The offending Maxtor simply | > aborts the read_native_max_ext | | I'll resend sans ata_id_has_hpa() change. Does that sound okay? I | don't really think we can do anything other than blacklisting it. Does that make your patch invalid or is it still ok? -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
