Hello, Mikael Pettersson wrote: >> buf[20] = (1 << 5) | ATA_REG_FEATURE; >> buf[21] = feature; >> buf[22] = (1 << 5) | ATA_REG_BYTEL; >> - buf[23] = nbytes & 0xFF; >> + buf[23] = qc->tf.lbam; >> buf[24] = (1 << 5) | ATA_REG_BYTEH; >> - buf[25] = (nbytes >> 8) & 0xFF; >> + buf[25] = qc->tf.lbah; > > The original code matches what Promise' own driver does, including > the "set byte counter register to real transfer byte count" comment. > It's certainly possible that if lbah/lbam don't match ->nbytes, > the HW will go nuts. Their data sheets are very quiet about ATAPI.
Yeah, now core code sets the value properly and I just posted a patch to massage transfer chunk size a bit so I was curious whether now sata_promise can use the result of core layer instead. > I can test your proposed change next weekend when I'm back to where > my sata_promise test equipment is. Thank you. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
