On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:14:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:47:11PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:32:03AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > Is there some reason you aren't using the "real" PCI driver api here > > > and registering a pci driver for these devices? That would take the > > > whole "loop over all pci devices" logic out of the code entirely. > > > > I recall we had a reason, but I no longer recall what it was. Some > > reason the "real" PCI driver API didn't fit at the time. If someone > > were to whip up a working patch, I'd happily apply it. > > "at the time"? It's been in place since the 2.2 days :) > > Is the problem that other drivers also want access to this PCI device > for some reason? > > I'll whip up a patch for you to test with in a bit...
Hm, that's wierd. I thought I got something, until I realized that you are doing a lot of logic before you ever even determine that your hardware is present in the system. Why are you calling calgary_locate_bbars() and doing all of that work? Or am I mising something in the code flow here? Also, it looks like you use the pci_get_device() to find the pci device, then you do somethings, and then drop the device, never to use it again. So, a traditional "probe" might not work as well, but it could be used if you want to. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
