evdev->client_list is rcu-protected. There is no need to have a
separate spinlock just for the list. Either one is good enough, so lets
drop the spinlock.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com>
---
Hi
I stumbled across this one when doing some evdev reviews. Maybe I'm missing
something obvious and I should stop coding on Sundays. But the RCU-protection
should be enough here, right?
We _could_ do a synchronize_rcu() during evdev_attach_client() to guarantee that
new events are really delivered once it returns. But that seems rather pedantic
to me.
I'm also not sure why we use RCU here, anyway. I mean, there's no high
contention so a spinlock should be fine and would get rid of the very expensive
synchronize_rcu during close(). But then again, I don't really care enough to
write benchmarks for that..
Thanks
David
drivers/input/evdev.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/evdev.c b/drivers/input/evdev.c
index 7a25a7a..1f38bd1 100644
--- a/drivers/input/evdev.c
+++ b/drivers/input/evdev.c
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ struct evdev {
wait_queue_head_t wait;
struct evdev_client __rcu *grab;
struct list_head client_list;
- spinlock_t client_lock; /* protects client_list */
struct mutex mutex;
struct device dev;
struct cdev cdev;
@@ -433,17 +432,13 @@ static int evdev_ungrab(struct evdev *evdev, struct
evdev_client *client)
static void evdev_attach_client(struct evdev *evdev,
struct evdev_client *client)
{
- spin_lock(&evdev->client_lock);
list_add_tail_rcu(&client->node, &evdev->client_list);
- spin_unlock(&evdev->client_lock);
}
static void evdev_detach_client(struct evdev *evdev,
struct evdev_client *client)
{
- spin_lock(&evdev->client_lock);
list_del_rcu(&client->node);
- spin_unlock(&evdev->client_lock);
synchronize_rcu();
}
@@ -485,10 +480,10 @@ static void evdev_hangup(struct evdev *evdev)
{
struct evdev_client *client;
- spin_lock(&evdev->client_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(client, &evdev->client_list, node)
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(client, &evdev->client_list, node)
kill_fasync(&client->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_HUP);
- spin_unlock(&evdev->client_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
wake_up_interruptible(&evdev->wait);
}
@@ -1438,7 +1433,6 @@ static int evdev_connect(struct input_handler *handler,
struct input_dev *dev,
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&evdev->client_list);
- spin_lock_init(&evdev->client_lock);
mutex_init(&evdev->mutex);
init_waitqueue_head(&evdev->wait);
evdev->exist = true;
--
2.0.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
